Journal article

Issues and considerations in the use of serologic biomarkers for classifying vaccination history in household surveys

Accurate estimates of vaccination coverage are crucial for assessing routine immunization program performance. Community based household surveys are frequently used to assess coverage within a country. In household surveys to assess routine immunization coverage, a child\'s vaccination history is classified on the basis of observation of the immunization card, parental recall of receipt of vaccination, or both; each of these methods has been shown to commonly be inaccurate. The use of serologic data as a biomarker of vaccination history is a potential additional approach to improve accuracy in classifying vaccination history. However, potential challenges, including the accuracy of serologic methods in classifying vaccination history, varying vaccine types and dosing schedules, and logistical and financial implications must be considered. We provide historic and scientific context for the potential use of serologic data to assess vaccination history and discuss in detail key areas of importance for consideration in the context of using serologic data for classifying vaccination history in household surveys. Further studies are needed to directly evaluate the performance of serologic data compared with use of immunization cards or parental recall for classification of vaccination history in household surveys, as well assess the impact of age at the time of sample collection on serologic titers, the predictive value of serology to identify a fully vaccinated child for multi-dose vaccines, and the cost impact and logistical issues on outcomes associated with different types of biological samples for serologic testing.

Languages

  • English

Publication year

1960

Publisher

Elselvier Ltd

Journal

Vaccine

Volume

2014 Sep 3;32(39):4893-900. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Jul 18.

Type

Journal article

Categories

  • Data

Tags

  • Coverage monitoring
  • Data quality
  • Immunization information systems

Topic references

COV-METH-PUB

TitleAuthorYearTypeLanguage
A computer simulation of the EPI survey strategy.Alexandre G. Tserkovnyi, Jacobus Keja, James Leonard Tulloch, John E. Dowd, Stanley Lemeshow, Steven K. LwangaJournal articleEnglish
A not quite as quick but much cleaner alternative to the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) Cluster Survey design.Anthony G. Turner , Muhammad Shuaib, Robert J. MagnaniJournal articleEnglish
Assessing and monitoring vaccination coverage levels: lessons from the Americas.Edgar Monterroso, Elizabeth R Zell, George Stroh, Gina Tambini, Héctor Izurieta, Linda Venczel, Vance Dietz2004Journal articleEnglish
Assessing equivalence: an alternative to the use of difference tests for measuring disparities in vaccination coverage.Elizabeth T. Luman, Lawrence E. Barker, Mary M. McCauley, Susan Y Chu2002Journal articleEnglish
Choosing a Cluster Sampling Design for Lot Quality Assurance Sampling SurveysEdward J. Bedrick, Lauren Hund, Marcello PaganoJournal articleEnglish
Cluster Lot Quality Assurance Sampling: Effect of Increasing the Number of Clusters on Classification Precision and Operational FeasibilityRoland W. Sutter, Steven G. F. Wassilak, Pascal Mkanda, Marina Takane, Alex N. Gasasira, Michael M. Nzioki, Alexandra E. Brown, Hiromasa OkayasuJournal articleEnglish
Comments on ‘‘Monitoring vaccination coverage: Defining the role of surveys”Robert Pond, Sandra Mounier-JackJournal articleEnglish
Consultancy services for conducting an evaluation of immunisation coverage monitoring methodology and processWolfgang Weber, Xavier Bosch-CapblanchGuidanceEnglish
Does adjusting for recall in trend analysis affect coverage estimates for maternal and child health indicators? An analysis of DHS and MICS survey dataDonela Besada, Nicholas P. Oliphant, Nobubelo K. Ngandu, Samuel Manda, Sarah Rohde, Tanya DohertyJournal articleEnglish
Effectiveness of Using Mobile Phone Image Capture for Collecting Secondary Data: A Case Study on Immunization History Data Among Children in Remote Areas of ThailandAmnat Khamsiriwatchara, Jaranit Kaewkungwal, Kasemsak Jandee, Peerawat Wansatid, Saranath Lawpoolsri, Waranya Wongwit2015Journal articleEnglish
Evaluating Confidence Interval Methods for Binomial Proportions in Clustered SurveysMarcello Pagano, Natalie DeanJournal articleEnglish
Immunization Coverage Surveys and Linked Biomarker Serosurveys in Three Regions in Ethiopia Jaya Goswami, Amha Kebede, Berhane Beyene, Inna Ruslanova, James D Campbell, Jenny Sequeira, Lisa Oot, Marcela F. Pasetti, Mardi Reymann, Mark A Travassos, Myron M Levine, Nigisti Mulholland, Robert Steinglass, Samba O Sow, Seydou S Diarra, Tassew Kassa, William C. Blackwelder, Yukun Wu, Zenaw AdamJournal articleEnglish
Issues and considerations in the use of serologic biomarkers for classifying vaccination history in household surveysAdam MacNeil, Chung-won Lee, Vance Dietz1960Journal articleEnglish
Lot Quality Assurance Sampling to Monitor Supplemental Immunization Activity Quality: An Essential Tool for Improving Performance in Polio Endemic CountriesAlexandra E. Brown, Arshad Quddus, George Walker, Guillaume Chabot-Couture, Hiromasa Okayasu, Michael M. Nzioki, Mufti Z. Wadood, Roland W. SutterJournal articleEnglish
LQAS: User BewareDale A. Rhoda, David J. Fitch, Soledad A. Fernandez, Stanley LemeshowJournal articleEnglish
Measurement of immunisation coverageJean-Marie Okwo-Bele, Maryanne Neil, Peter Salama, Tessa Wardlaw, Tony BurtonJournal articleEnglish
Measuring Coverage in MNCH: A Validation Study Linking Population Survey Derived Coverage to Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Care Records in Rural ChinaBiqin Tan, Harry Campbell, Jennifer Bryce, Li Liu, Li Yang, Lirong Ju, Mengying Li, Neff Walker, Robert E. Black, Yan Guo2013Journal articleEnglish
Measuring coverage in MNCH: total survey error and the interpretation of intervention coverage estimates from household surveys.Aluisio J D Barros, Dale A. Rhoda, Felicity T Cutts, Fred Arnold, Joseph Keating, Ruilin Ren, Thomas P. EiseleJournal articleEnglish
Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Tracking Progress in Health for Women and Children Using DHS and MICS Household SurveysAttila Hancioglu, Fred ArnoldJournal articleEnglish
Measuring populations to improve vaccination coverageAli Djibo, Andrew J. Tatem, Bryan T. Grenfell, Matthew J. Ferrari, Nita Bharti2016Journal articleEnglish
Measuring the performance of vaccination programs using cross-sectional surveys: a likelihood framework and retrospective analysis.Bryan T. Grenfell, C. Jessica E. Metcalf, Derek A. T. Cummings, Francisco J. Luquero, Justin Lessler, Rebecca F. GraisJournal articleEnglish
Monitoring vaccination coverage: Defining the role of surveysDale A. Rhoda, Felicity T Cutts, M. Carolina Danovaro-Holliday, Pierre ClaquinJournal articleEnglish
Reply to comments on Monitoring vaccination coverage: Defining the role of surveys.Dale A. Rhoda, Felicity T Cutts, M. Carolina Danovaro-Holliday, Pierre ClaquinJournal articleEnglish
Seroepidemiology: an underused tool for designing and monitoring vaccination programmes in low- and middleincome countriesFelicity T Cutts, Matt HansonJournal articleEnglish
Use and abuse of rapid monitoring to assess coverage during mass vaccination campaigns.Elizabeth T. Luman, K. Lisa Cairns, Robert Perry, Vance DietzGuidanceEnglish
Validity of reported vaccination coverage in 45 countries.Christopher J. L. Murray, Bakhuti Shengelia, Neeru Gupta, Saba Moussavi, Ajay Tandon, Michel Thieren2003Journal articleEnglish
Validity of vaccination cards and parental recall to estimate vaccination coverage: a systematic review of the literature.Elizabeth T. Luman, Elizabeth Zell, Melody Miles, Tove K. Ryman, Vance DietzJournal articleEnglish