Dimanche 27 Juillet 2025
  3 réponses
  2.4K visites

I believe there are two type of hexavalent vaccine which contain a cellular pertussis vaccine and another is whole-cell pertussis vaccine.

So, which vaccine is effective to use for routine immunization program?

 

Thank you for raising this point. Two hexavalent formulations are available, distinguished only by the pertussis component.

Whole-cell pertussis hexavalent (DTwP-HB-Hib-IPV)

Uses the same DTwP antigen already present in the pentavalent vaccine.
Generates a stronger and longer-lasting immune response – an advantage in settings with higher pertussis transmission.
Costs less per dose (Gavi-supported) and has a familiar, short-lived fever profile for programmes already using pentavalent DTwP.

Acellular pertussis hexavalent (DTaP-HB-Hib-IPV)

Causes fewer post-vaccination fevers but is more expensive, and immunity tends to wane sooner.
Better suited to high-income countries where pertussis incidence is low and budgets can absorb the higher price.

For routine immunisation in low- and middle-income countries, the whole-cell formulation is usually the better fit. It offers more durable protection at lower cost, with no unexpected side-effects compared with pentavalent DTwP. Both products are WHO pre-qualified, but Senegal and Mauritania opted for the DTwP-based hexavalent when they introduced the vaccine in July 2025.

I unpack these details and what they mean for closing the IPV2 gap in this week’s Immunization for Resilience Newsletter. I hope you find the deeper dive useful. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hexavalent-vaccine-africa-one-shot-six-shields-tambe-vdvbe  Thank you 

il y a 1 an
·
#7812

Thank you Sir

for the update.

il y a 1 an
·
#7815

This is very useful as countries continue to engage Government and partners in swtiching to Hexa.

  • Page :
  • 1
Il n'y a pas encore de réponse à ce message.