Post0235 ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT 24 March 2000
CONTENTS
1. SCIENTISTS DEFINE GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE CRISIS
2. THE 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF EARTH DAY
3. BRITISH PARLIAMENT MAY ENFORCE PURCHASE OF GREEN POWER
4. NEW MOTOROLA FUEL CELL SMALL, STRONG
5. FUEL-CELL FUTURE FOR GASOLINE?
6. STUDY: DIESEL EXHAUSTS CAUSE CANCER
1. SCIENTISTS DEFINE GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE CRISIS
___________________________________________________________________________
Scientists Define Global Climate Change Crisis
By Martha Heil
WASHINGTON, DC, February 24, 2000 (ENS) - Global warming will affect far
more than the natural environment, climate experts said this weekend at a
scientific meeting in Washington, DC. Public health, real estate, commerce
and global environmental policy will all feel the heat over the next 100
years - making climate change an issue that affects everyone.
Some of the world?s top climate forecasters were in Washington, DC this week
for the 2000 meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of
Science. They reviewed research detailing a broad spectrum of potential
consequences of global warming, ranging from altered water cycles, to
frequent storms and floods, to displaced species.
Rising temperatures could put pressure on utilities, as more people turn up
their air conditioners (Photo by Richard Frear, courtesy National Park
Service) One of the biggest research areas of the future, the scientists
said, will be how global warming affects the world?s human population.
Heat waves, which have already increased by 20 percent since 1949, are
expected to increase the frequency of heat strokes, analysts from the U.S.
National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and
Change projected. A greater demand for air conditioning puts demands on
power plants, which will in turn use more cooling water, putting more demand
on scarce water situations.
Levels of pollution rise as atmospheric temperatures go up, said Devra
Davis, director of the Health, Environment, and Development Program at the
World Resources Institute. She cited deadly concentrations of industrial
smog in Donora, Pennsylvania in 1948, and in London in 1952, which were
related to weather patterns like El Nino.
Rita Colwell directs the National Science Foundation (Photo courtesy NSF)
Changes in climate also link indirectly to public health issues. "Cholera
epidemics can now be related to climate and climate events, including ocean
warming events such as El Nino," said Rita Colwell, director of the National
Science Foundation. "High temperature and high sea level drives cholera
levels up." The cholera bacterium is a parasite of a common plankton, and
warmer waters will mean more hosts and more chances for cholera to
replicate.
In Africa, a rain 60 times heavier than normal caused an outbreak of Rift
Valley fever in 1998, the most recent El Nino year. Mosquitoes that carry
the disease bred in the extremely wet conditions. Scientists predict that
similar disease outbreaks could occur in the changing climate. "The vectors
for disease are already here," said Colwell.
Melting ice caps, sea level rise and frequent storms - all consequences of
the projected temperature rise - could cause catastrophic floods. This can
bring pollutants and waste into relatively clean areas. "It?s not just one
toxin issue at a time," said Jonathan Patz, director of the Program on
Health Effects of Global Environmental Change, Division of Occupational and
Environmental Health, at the of Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. "We
have to look at the problem integratively."
Consequences for real estate are likely to be serious, said David Pimentel
of Cornell University. With the projected one meter (39 inch) sea level
rise, almost 15 meters (49 feet) of shoreline may be lost. Cropland is
expected to decline by 30 percent, while the population is projected to
double by 2075, leaving many people hungry. Western alpine forests are
likely to disappear, threatening the environment and the timber industry,
said Steven McNulty of the U.S. Forest Service. Aspens, maple and birch are
among the trees which may have their numbers reduced by up to 90 percent.
Southeastern forests are calculated to decrease by 11 percent.
The researchers say that individuals, industry and government all have a
responsibility to be aware of global warming?s potential effects. A
committee called Integrated Regional Assessment, under the auspices of the
National Science Foundation, is focusing its efforts on researching
effective global warming policies, but has no specific suggestions to offer
as yet.
Flooding from rising sea levels could sweep toxins into previously
unpolluted areas (Photo courtesy Johns Hopkins School of Public Health) Some
suggested that industry driven research would be profitable and likely to be
self sustaining. "Institutions can help provide the information needed to
address this issue," said Hadi Dowlatabadi, director of the Center for the
Integrated Study of the Human Dimensions of Global Change at Carnegie Mellon
University.
Other scientists debated where the responsibility of changing practices that
contribute to global warming should lie - with the individual or in
government regulations.
"A system based on emissions allocations is unlikely to achieve real climate
protection," said John Topping of the Climate Institute. The Kyoto Protocol,
an international agreement to reduce six greenhouse gases in 39
industrialized countries, was signed in 1997, but has not yet been ratified
by the U.S. Senate or by any other country whose emissions are controlled by
the agreement.
Some scientists believe that governments will respond more effectively if
voters make addressing climate change a priority. "We all have a
responsibility to act," said Laura Westra, professor of environmental
studies at Sarah Lawrence College.
The media?s attention to environmental problems, like the last decade?s
prominent news coverage of the hole in the ozone layer, can also motivate
action. "I guess we?ll have to have a climate hole," said Steven Schneider,
professor of biological sciences at Stanford University.
"We?ve assumed that the future of climate will look just like the past,"
said Peter Gleick, president of the Pacific Institute for Studies in
Development, Environment and Security. "We can say with high confidence that
that?s not true."
? Environment News Service (ENS) 2000. All Rights Reserved.
____________________________________*______________________________________
2. THE 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF EARTH DAY
___________________________________________________________________________
Alliance to Save Energy Launches Earth Day 2000 Web Contest Featuring
Home Energy Prizes
WASHINGTON, Feb. 7 -/E-Wire/-- Kicking off a months-long focus on
Earth Day 2000, the 30th anniversary of Earth Day, which will involve half
a billion people around the globe, the Alliance to Save Energy has launched
a web contest featuring a host of home energy prizes.
CONTACT: Rozanne Weissman of the Alliance to Save Energy,
202-530-2217 or [[email protected]][email protected][/email]/
Web site: http://www.ase.org/earthday
http://www.ase.org/earthday/contest/prizes.htm
http://www.ase.org
http://www.ENERGYguide.com/
_________________________________*_________________________________________
3. BRITISH PARLIAMENT MAY ENFORCE PURCHASE OF GREEN POWER
___________________________________________________________________________
BRITISH PARLIAMENT MAY ENFORCE PURCHASE OF GREEN POWER
LONDON, England, January 25, 2000 (ENS) - The British government will have
the power to require electricity suppliers to generate a portion of their
power from renewable energy sources, if a new bill placed before Parliament
becomes law.
The Utilities Bill was introduced late last week to ensure first class
utilities for all consumers at lower prices and put right the deficiencies
of the present structure which fails to ensure effective competition, said
Trade & Industry Secretary Stephen Byers. The proposed legislation is part
of the government's program to reform the power industry in Britain.
The bill, which must now be debated by Parliament, is the first major reform
in over a decade for the way in which the country's privatised utilities are
regulated.
The Bill gives Byers the right to enforce the purchase of green power,
including the power to impose financial penalties on suppliers that do not
purchase sufficient renewable energy.
The country?s first utility, British Telecom, was privatised 15 years ago,
and the government wants a more consistent regulatory framework that will
benefit both customers and utilities. Power bills are predicted to fall by
at least 10 percent as a result of the new law.
"This Bill will ensure that consumers and businesses get a fair deal from
our utilities,said Byers. It will tackle the rigged electricity market
created when the industry was privatised and put in place a modern framework
for utility regulation.
The proposals include new objectives for government regulators that are
designed to protect consumer interests and the right to impose tough fines
on companies that are found guilty of bad practice or poor performance,
including interruptions to the supply of power and the speed of reconnecting
customers. There will be no upper limit on the fines the regulator can
impose.
Independent consumer councils will be established for the gas and
electricity industries, as well as the telecommunications and water
utilities, to investigate customer complaints.
The Bill will require companies that provide price-regulated services to
disclose how they link the pay of their directors to the levels of customer
service.
"We will have new powers which will help us to meet our climate change
targets by improving energy efficiency, added Environment Minister Michael
Meacher. We will have powers to set requirements for energy utilities to
encourage and help low income and other customers to make better use of
energy and to save money.
The Bill will contain provisions that were announced by government officials
in July 1998 and last October. Additional measures to deal with cross-
utility issues and specific energy measures will be introduced later as the
Bill is debated by the Commons Committee.
While welcoming substantial parts of the new package, environmental groups
have attacked the draft law for being too vague and stressed that the
government was actually committing itself to doing virtually nothing for the
environment. NGOs also claim that a new electricity trading mechanism
proposed under the law would actually harm renewables, combined heat and
power and smaller generators.
? Environment News Service (ENS) 2000. All Rights Reserved.
____________________________________*______________________________________
4. NEW MOTOROLA FUEL CELL SMALL, STRONG
___________________________________________________________________________
NEW MOTOROLA FUEL CELL SMALL, STRONG
Laptops, phones would get boost with liquid methanol
Inexpensive replaceable methanol fuel cartridges (like those shown in this
Motorola Labs concept photo) may one day replace rechargeable batteries as
a long-lasting energy source for numerous electronic products ranging from
cellular phones and computers to electronic games.
REUTERS
SCHAUMBURG, Ill., Jan. 19 Motorola Inc. said Wednesday that researchers
developed a powerful, miniature fuel cell that may one day replace
traditional batteries in laptop computers, cellular phones and other
devices.
The fuel cells, which are still about three to five years away from the
store shelves, could power a wireless phone for more than a month and keep a
laptop running for 20 hours.
MOTOROLA, the world?s No. 2 wireless phone maker and a major computer chip
manufacturer, said scientists at its labs and at Los Alamos National
Laboratory used liquid methanol to power the cells, which last up to 10
times longer than existing rechargeable batteries. Liquid methanol, a wood
alcohol, is also used in windshield wiper fluid.
The fuel cells, which are still about three to five years away from the
store shelves, could power a wireless phone for more than a month and keep a
laptop running for 20 hours, Bill Ooms, director of Motorola?s material,
device, and energy research, said in a telephone interview.
They would use small plastic canisters similar to those used for fountain
pen ink. Consumers could easily check the methanol level to find out when to
replace the fuel cell, which will likely cost as much as or less than
traditional rechargeables, Ooms said.
Manufacturers are constantly developing new features for portable electronic
equipment that require more power and longer operating life, Ooms said.
These fuel cells have an amazing ability to produce energy for longer
periods of time while weighing far less than conventional batteries.
CHEMICAL TO ELECTRICAL
Fuel cells convert chemical energy directly to electrical energy. The basic
concept of a fuel cell originated in 1839, but practical applications came
from NASA in the early days of space flight, Motorola said. These new
miniature cells, each measuring about one inch square and less than one-
tenth of an inch in thickness, use a reservoir of inexpensive methanol that,
when combined with the oxygen in the air, produces electricity.
The air breathing fuel cell was developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
The highly simplified and miniaturized design eliminates the need for air
pumps, heat exchangers and other complex devices that previous fuel cells
required and therefore disqualified them from successful use in small
portable electronic products.
? 2000 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or
redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without
the prior written consent of Reuters.
____________________________________*______________________________________
5. FUEL-CELL FUTURE FOR GASOLINE?
___________________________________________________________________________
NEW SCIENTIST ? [Archive: 13 February 1999] Fuel-cell future for gasoline?
RESEARCHERS FIND WAY TO RUN ?GREEN? ENGINES ON HYDROCARBONS
A few fuel-cell vehicles are already on the road, among them this bus in
Vancouver, Canada. Its debut in October 1998 included a toast with the bus
exhaust's only emission: water vapor.
----
By Miguel Llanos
MSNBC
March 15 Researchers announced Wednesday a breakthrough that could lead to
fuel cells powered by gasoline, giving drivers two to three times more
mileage. The advance could speed up what fuel-cell advocates see as the
demise of the internal combustion engine.
WE?VE DEMONSTRATED that we can run a fuel cell directly on hydrocarbons like
gasoline and diesel, researcher Ray Gorte told MSNBC. In the past, everyone
assumed you had to use hydrogen. Fuel cells essentially are high-tech
batteries that draw electrical current from reactions between chemicals.
Unlike a battery, however, they do not run down or need recharging as long
as they are supplied with fuel. NASA has used them for years to power space
missions. Essentially, the University of Pennsylvania fuel cell streamlines
the fuel-cell process. Until now, supplying hydrogen to fuel cells was seen
as the best way to power them. The new process gets hydrogen directly from
hydrocarbons like gasoline, diesel or natural gas, so there?s no need for
extracting hydrogen from costlier and more complicated sources like methane.
And because fuel cells are two to three times more efficient than internal
combustion engines in how they use energy, a gasoline fuel cell could get
two to three times the mileage of a traditional engine.
The new process not only gets around the problem of delivering and storing
hydrogen, Gorte says, it means a fuel cell that produces less carbon dioxide
for a given amount of energy than other fuel cells because higher efficiency
can be achieved. Many scientists fear carbon dioxide is a key contributor to
warmer temperatures around the globe.
The fossil fuel cell would still be limited by Earth?s finite supply of
hydrocarbons, but it could provide a valuable interim technology that?s
easier to deploy and still provide much cleaner and higher mileage than
enternal combustion engines. Reported in Wednesday?s issue of the peer-
reviewed journal Nature, the study was funded by the Chicago-based Gas
Research Institute, which hopes the cells could be used in the home to
produce electricity from natural gas.
NO ?REFINERY? NEEDED
Gorte, head of chemical engineering at the University of Pennsylvania, sees
the research as a breakthrough, saying an earlier attempt to use gasoline
essentially required putting a refinery in your trunk to get the
hydrogen.
The test also used a different kind of fuel cell than the type most
researchers and fuel-cell companies have focused on. Gorte?s team used a
solid oxide fuel cell, while others have tended to focus on proton-exchange
membranes. Gorte emphasized that the the experiment was not on a commercial
scale and that long-term testing is needed. One hitch is that the cell is
sensitive to sulfur, so that gasoline would have to be cleaned further to
make it a viable fuel.
Moreover, the small-scale fuel cell churns out only one-tenth of the power
of a hydrogen fuel cell. But Gorte is optimistic about its potential, saying
his team hopes to work with a major car company that has created a solid
oxide fuel cell division. He would not identify the company, saying he
wasn?t sure if it was willing to go public yet. Shorter term, possibly
within a decade, the fuel cell could be used for portable generators for
businesses and homes.
NATURE?S SOLUTION?
Kevin Kendall, a chemical engineer at Britain?s University of Birmingham,
writes in a Nature article accompanying the study that while hydrogen is the
ultimate clean power source of the future it is still expensive to extract
it, difficult to store and prone to explosion.
The new research, he adds, provides an interim technology by tapping into
the hydrogen stored naturally in hydrocarbons. Nature seems to achieve this
with ease through biochemical routes described in the study, he notes.
Kendall even ventures that fuel-cell progress will go beyond just replacing
internal combustion engines, as well as their noise and pollutants. By the
end of the century, he writes, these fiery combustion processes may be
banned.
____________________________________*______________________________________
6. STUDY: DIESEL EXHAUSTS CAUSE CANCER
___________________________________________________________________________
Study: Diesel Exhausts Cause Cancer
By H. JOSEF HEBERT Associated Press Writer 03:26 AM ET 03/15/00
WASHINGTON (AP) _ Toxic chemicals in diesel exhausts from trucks and buses
are responsible for at least 125,000 cancers over a lifetime, according to a
study by a coalition of state and local air pollution control agencies.
The state officials' report being released today comes as the petroleum
industry is stepping up a campaign to persuade the Clinton administration to
back off from plans for tougher pollution controls on diesel fuel.
Although the new regulations for diesel, now under review at the White
House, would not go into effect until 2006, industry groups hoped the
current turmoil about diesel fuel prices _ and to some extent supply _ might
help sway the administration.
The Environmental Protection Agency's proposal, sent to the White House
Office of Management and Budget earlier this year, would sharply reduce the
sulfur content in diesel fuel and require other pollution improvements.
An EPA spokeswoman, Kim Ruby, declined to comment on the proposal, except to
say it had been sent to the White House. Some industry groups and government
sources said it would require sulfur levels in diesel to be reduced from 500
parts per million to 15 per million by 2006, though the specifics could
still be changed.
The state regulators, along with environmentalists and health advocates,
planned to release the new analysis on diesel and cancer risks, partly in
response to the industry push to try to get the EPA regulation withdrawn.
``These (diesel) fumes are putting us at risk of cancer, a risk that can be
almost completely eliminated with modern pollution controls,'' said William
Becker, executive director of the State and Territorial Air Pollution
Program Administrators.
The group, which represents state pollution control officials, conducted the
analysis that concludes an additional 125,000 people would be expected to
get lung cancer during their lifetime as a result of exposure to chemicals
and soot from diesel fuel.
Becker said there have been many epidemiological studies linking diesel soot
and lung cancer and that the 125,110 estimated of additional cancers was
``an extremely conservative figure'' using the same methodology used by
regulators in California in estimating diesel-related cancers.
``The actual numbers of cancers could easily be 10 times as high,''
maintained Becker.
Last year, the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the air
pollution control agency in the Los Angeles area, concluded that 70 percent
of the total cancer risks from transportation sources in the region came
from diesel emissions.
Becker said his group's analysis used the California methodology and
extended it nationwide, using air pollution monitoring data from both
metropolitan and rural areas and accounting for population distributions.
It estimated 119,570 additional cancers in metropolitan areas and 5,540 such
additional cancers in rural areas nationwide.
The state regulators as well as the American Lung Association and several
environmental groups including the U.S. Public Interest Research Group and
the Clean Air Network, maintain these health statistics make a strong
argument for pressing ahead with the proposed EPA diesel rules.
But in a letter earlier this week to the EPA, nine organizations
representing a variety of interests from refiners and oil companies to
convenience store operators and farm cooperatives, urged that the diesel
rule be withdrawn.
``EPA's proposal for diesel sulfur is likely to reduce the supply of diesel
fuel as well as heating oil and even gasoline,'' they said in a letter to
EPA Administrator Carol Browner.
The letter noted recent trucker protests about soaring prices and said the
EPA proposal was ``a blueprint for future shortages of diesel and home
heating oil.''
Diesel prices have soared from a nationwide average of 96 cents a gallon a
year ago to more than an average of $1.50 a gallon, according to the Energy
Department, with prices in some areas of more than $1.86 cents a gallon.
The increases have been attributed by the Energy Department to increases in
crude oil costs and supply shortages caused by a cutback in world oil
production.
____________________________________*________________________
Il n'y a pas encore de réponse à ce message.